Kohn Smith Roth
  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Profiles
  • Criminal Defense
    • Drug Crimes
    • Drunk Driving
    • Sex Crimes
    • White Collar Crimes
    • Violent Crimes
    • Appeals
    • College Student Defense
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
Select Page

Intent to harm needed for cyberstalking prosecution

On behalf of Kohn Smith Roth | Aug 19, 2015 | Internet Crimes

Charges against a defendant can grow complicated when an alleged crime involves the Internet. For instance, the Wisconsin law against stalking mainly includes physical intrusions into another person’s life for the purpose of harassing him or her. The law also prohibits using a phone, recording equipment, the mail or some other delivery system to abuse a victim.

The stalking law does not address the specific use of electronic devices. However, the state statute known as the unlawful use of computerized communication systems does. So, while Wisconsin has no fixed cyberstalking law, a defendant can be in plenty of legal trouble for using the Internet to annoy, frighten or harass another person.

Cyberstalking may be described as stalking from a distance. In some cases, the crime resembles identity theft, although the motivation behind the two crimes differs. For identity thieves, someone else’s confidential information is a possible ticket to financial gain but, for cyberstalkers, the data is way to harm the victim in another way.

An online stalker researches a victim’s personal life online by visiting public information and social media sites. Some stalkers employ hardware devices or software programs to steal a victim’s identifying information. Damage is done when the information is used to monitor, scare or harm the reputation of another person.

Cyberstalking isn’t easy to prove. According to the National White Collar Crime Center, humiliated victims may not report the crime and, even when they do, some law enforcement agencies are not trained or equipped to investigate the claims. Prosecutors also have difficulties proving a defendant, distanced by the Internet, posed a “credible threat” to an alleged victim.

Laws may not be broken even when harassing or abusive actions take place, unless the behaviors are repeated with the express purpose of causing harm. Actions without intent may not be prosecutable. A Kohn Smith Roth attorney knows when the legal boundaries are and aren’t crossed.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Categories

  • blog (9)
  • Criminal Defense (8)
  • Domestic Violence (12)
  • Domestic Violence (10)
  • Drug Crimes (145)
  • Drug Crimes (10)
  • Federal Crimes (39)
  • Internet Crimes (43)
  • Sex Crimes (125)
  • Sex Crimes (10)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Violent Crimes (50)
  • Violent Crimes (10)
  • White Collar Crimes (75)
  • White Collar Crimes (10)

Archives

  • October 2019 (6)
  • July 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • May 2019 (2)
  • April 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (3)
  • January 2019 (2)
  • December 2018 (2)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • July 2018 (5)
  • June 2018 (15)
  • May 2018 (4)
  • April 2018 (8)
  • March 2018 (9)
  • February 2018 (11)
  • January 2018 (13)
  • December 2017 (10)
  • November 2017 (11)
  • October 2017 (8)
  • September 2017 (9)
  • August 2017 (10)
  • July 2017 (7)
  • June 2017 (11)
  • May 2017 (9)
  • April 2017 (15)
  • March 2017 (12)
  • February 2017 (9)
  • January 2017 (6)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (11)
  • October 2016 (9)
  • September 2016 (8)
  • August 2016 (12)
  • July 2016 (7)
  • June 2016 (11)
  • May 2016 (10)
  • April 2016 (8)
  • March 2016 (9)
  • February 2016 (11)
  • January 2016 (9)
  • December 2015 (10)
  • November 2015 (4)
  • October 2015 (9)
  • September 2015 (9)
  • August 2015 (8)
  • July 2015 (10)
  • June 2015 (8)
  • May 2015 (9)
  • April 2015 (8)
  • March 2015 (9)
  • February 2015 (8)
  • January 2015 (9)
  • December 2014 (9)
  • November 2014 (8)
  • October 2014 (9)
  • September 2014 (10)
  • August 2014 (9)
  • July 2014 (8)
  • June 2014 (9)
  • May 2014 (9)
  • April 2014 (8)
  • March 2014 (9)
  • February 2014 (8)
  • January 2014 (9)

Recent Posts

  • Why do false domestic violence allegations arise?
  • Should you avoid social media while under investigation?
  • Do you know the different types of domestic violence?
  • Breaking down the risks of sharing prescription medication
  • Committing accidental credit card fraud

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

findlaw-network

Contact Us For Help

EMAIL US FOR A RESPONSE

Kohn Smith Roth
Milwaukee Criminal Defense Attorneys

Kohn Smith Roth
1110 N Old World 3rd St Suite 201
Milwaukee, WI 53203

Milwaukee Law Office Map

Follow Us On

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2019 Kohn Smith Roth. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters